z-logo
Premium
Stabilizing Surface Lattice O n − (0 <  n  < 2) for Long‐Term Durability of LiCoO 2
Author(s) -
Zhao Wenguang,
Li Mingyang,
Li Zijian,
Ren Hengyu,
Wang Xiaohu,
Yin Xingxing,
Ding Wangyang,
Chen Guojie,
Chen Shiming,
Yi Haocong,
Li Shunning,
Wang Jun,
Zhou Dong,
Zhou Lin,
Lin Hai,
Fei Bin,
Pan Feng,
Zhao Qinghe
Publication year - 2025
Publication title -
angewandte chemie international edition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.831
H-Index - 550
eISSN - 1521-3773
pISSN - 1433-7851
DOI - 10.1002/anie.202503100
Subject(s) - spinel , lattice (music) , durability , materials science , cathode , instability , chemistry , composite material , metallurgy , physics , acoustics , mechanics
Abstract The instability of surface lattice O n − (0 <  n  < 2) in charged LiCoO₂ (LCO) limits its long‐term cycling stability beyond 4.55 V versus Li/Li⁺. Herein, the spinel and rock‐salt (RS) phases are constructed on LCO surface to stabilize lattice O n − , namely S‐LCO and R‐LCO, respectively. Upon long‐term cycling at 4.6 V, the loss of lattice O n − leads to a progressive deterioration of surface spinel phase, which ultimately transforms into a strong Li + ‐blocking phase. In contrast, for R‐LCO, the surface lattice O n − in the RS phase remains stable in long‐term cycles. Theoretical calculations reveal that the migration barriers of lattice O n − are significantly higher in the RS phase than in the spinel phase. Due to the stabilized surface lattice O n − , the R‐LCO||Li cell shows an impressive capacity retention of 78.6% after 1000 cycles at 4.6 V (at 1C rate) and superior floating charge durability at 45 °C. This study highlights the importance of surface structure tailoring in developing advanced LCO cathodes.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom