Premium
An Assessment of Blended Short Loop Recycled Graphite Electrodes Using X‐Ray Micro‐Computed Tomography
Author(s) -
Scott Sean,
Du Wenjia,
Horwood Rosie,
Lei Chunhong,
Shearing Paul,
Abbott Andrew P.
Publication year - 2025
Publication title -
advanced energy materials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 10.08
H-Index - 220
eISSN - 1614-6840
pISSN - 1614-6832
DOI - 10.1002/aenm.202403498
Subject(s) - materials science , computed tomography , graphite , electrode , x ray , tomography , loop (graph theory) , composite material , optics , radiology , chemistry , medicine , physics , mathematics , combinatorics
Abstract With various battery directives necessitating the composition of recycled electrode materials this study manufactures anodes containing various ratios of pristine and reclaimed graphite from end‐of‐life (EOL) cells. Two approaches that can be used to delaminate graphite are using ultrasonication (USD) and simple water delamination (WD). X‐ray micro‐computed tomography is used to characterize the graphite particles and show that particle fracturing is evident with both methods, but key structural metrics such as particle radius and diffusivity varied significantly. It is shown that blending 20% recovers material with 80% pristine graphite causes no statistically significant difference in the performance of the cells. This suggests that recycling anode materials can be achieved without significant post‐processing required. For WD anode material, the spherical graphite particles are maintained, whereas USD significantly changes the morphology and produces a large amount of “needle‐like” particles. Using 100% reclaimed anode material causes the performance of the cell to decrease to 279 mAh g −1 for WD material and 254 mAh g −1 for USD graphite. The use of “blended” electrodes using WD graphite and pristine material creates electrodes with a comparable Li + flux and electrochemical performance to a pristine graphite reference of 300–315 mAh g −1 .