Thermodilution vs Estimated Fick Cardiac Output Measurement in Clinical Practice | Zendy

Alexander R. Opotowsky | Zendy; Edward Hess | Zendy; Bradley A. Maron | Zendy; Evan L. Brittain | Zendy; Anna E. Barón | Zendy; Thomas M. Maddox | Zendy; Laith Alshawabkeh | Zendy; Bradley M. Wertheim | Zendy; Meng Xu | Zendy; Tufik R. Assad | Zendy; Jonathan D. Rich | Zendy; Gaurav Choudhary | Zendy; Ryan J. Tedford | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Thermodilution vs Estimated Fick Cardiac Output Measurement in Clinical Practice

Author(s) -

Alexander R. Opotowsky,

Edward Hess,

Bradley A. Maron,

Evan L. Brittain,

Anna E. Barón,

Thomas M. Maddox,

Laith Alshawabkeh,

Bradley M. Wertheim,

Meng Xu,

Tufik R. Assad,

Jonathan D. Rich,

Gaurav Choudhary,

Ryan J. Tedford

Publication year - 2017

Publication title -

jama cardiology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 6.108

H-Index - 63

eISSN - 2380-6591

pISSN - 2380-6583

DOI - 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2945

Subject(s) - medicine , cardiac catheterization , cohort , veterans affairs , retrospective cohort study , cardiac output , cohort study , body surface area , cardiac index , cardiology , referral , hemodynamics , family medicine

Thermodilution (Td) and estimated oxygen uptake Fick (eFick) methods are widely used to measure cardiac output (CO). They are often used interchangeably to make critical clinical decisions, yet few studies have compared these approaches as applied in medical practice.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research