z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Low vs high and #8220;water footprint assessment and #8221; diet in milk production: A comparison between triticale and corn silage based diets
Author(s) -
Carlo Cosentino,
Francesco Adduci,
Mauro Musto,
Rosanna Paolino,
Pierangelo Freschi,
G Pecora,
Valeria Valentini
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
emirates journal of food and agriculture
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.304
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 2079-0538
pISSN - 2079-052X
DOI - 10.9755/ejfa.v27i3.19226
Subject(s) - silage , triticale , milking , agronomy , forage , animal feed , animal husbandry , biology , zoology , food science , agriculture , ecology
The agriculture account is 92% of the global freshwater footprint, and 29% of this amount is used in animal husbandry to produce forage, to mix animal feed, for drinking of the animals and, at least, in the farm activities. In this trial we tested two diets whose production is characterized by different water consumption. Two homogeneous groups of milking cows were used to compare two different diets: standard feeding, with corn silage-based diet; and alternative feeding, with triticale silage-based diet. Both silages represented about 47% of diet composition. Diets were characterized by the same energy and protein content. Despite the lowest water consumption of the triticale silage group, no significant differences were observed between the groups on production level and on milk chemical composition

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom