EFFECT OF CROSS-LINKING ON PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND IN VITRO DIGESTIBILITY PROPERTIES OF POTATO STARCH

R E G U L A R A R T I C L E *Corresponding author: Yoon Hyuk Chang, Department of Food and Nutrition, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea. Phone: +82-2-961-0552; Fax: +82-2-961-0261, E-mail: yhchang@khu.ac.kr Received: 31 January 2017; Revised: 23 April 2017; Accepted: 30 April 2017; Published Online: 13 May 2017 Heo, et al.: Crosslinked potato starch 464 Emir. J. Food Agric ● Vol 29 ● Issue 6 ● 2017 Many of the earlier literatures on starch modification with STMP/STPP were performed on wheat and corn starches (Kahraman et al., 2015; Koo et al., 2010; Sang et al., 2007; Van Hung and Morita, 2005; Chung et al., 2004; Lim and Seib, 1993). When using STMP alone, the amount of substitution is restricted to 0.04% phosphorus (P) content. On the other hand, when native starch is reacted with a mixture of STMP and STPP, the permitted P amounts are ten times higher (CFR, 2013). According to Lim and Seib (1993), the mixture of STMP/STPP provided better outcomes than utilizing only STMP for preparing the cross-linked starches. However, there is little information regarding the in vitro digestibility and physicochemical properties of potato starch cross-linked using STMP/STPP. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate the physicochemical and in vitro digestibility characteristics of potato starch cross-linked with STMP/STPP. MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials Potatoes (Goun) were obtained from the National Institute of Highland, Pyeongchang, Korea. Sodium trimetaphosphate (STMP), sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP), and porcine pancreatin (P-7545, activity 8 × USP/g) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Amyloglucosidase (AMG 300 L, 300 AGU/mL) was purchased from Novozymes (Basvaerd, Denmark). The total starch assay kit was obtained from Megazyme International Ireland Ltd (Bray, Ireland). All other chemical reagents were of analytical grade. Isolation of potato starch Potato starch was isolated following the method of Djabali et al. (2009) and Huang et al. (2015), with slight modifications. Potatoes were washed, peeled, and cut into cubes. Cubes were steeped in 0.1 % (w/v) sodium bisulfite solution, smashed in a blender, filtered with distilled water through a 100-mesh sieve (Chung Gye Sang Gong Sa, Seoul, Korea), and centrifuged at 3,500 rpm for 10 min (VS-5000N, Vision scientific Co., Seoul, Korea). Centrifugation was repeated until pure white starch was obtained. The starch was dried at 45 °C for 48 h. The dried starch was then milled and sieved through a 100-mesh sieve. Preparation of cross-linked potato starch Cross-linked potato starch (CLPS) samples were prepared according to the method of Woo and Seib (2002), with some modifications. Potato starch (100 g, db), sodium sulfate (10 g), and different amounts (0.0125, 0.025, 0.05, 0.5, 5, and 10 g) of a 99:1 mixture of STMP and STPP were mixed in distilled water (140 mL). After the pH was adjusted to 11.0 with 1 N NaOH, the slurry was kept at 45 °C for 3 h using a magnetic stirrer equipped with a temperature controller (PS-1000, EYELA, Tokyo, Japan). The suspension was neutralized to pH 6.5 with 1 N HCl to stop the reaction and centrifuged, with distilled water washing, five times. After drying at 45 °C for 48 h, the dried samples were ground and passed through a 100-mesh sieve. Based on the different amounts of STMP/STPP, the samples cross-linked by STMP/STPP at 0.0125, 0.025, 0.05, 0.5, 5, and 10 % (w/w, based on the potato starch) were designated as CLPS-0.0125, CLPS-0.025, CLPS-0.05, CLPS-0.5, CLPS-5, and CLPS-10, respectively. The flow chart for cross-linking potato starch is shown in Fig. 1. Chemical composition analysis The chemical composition of the native potato starch (NPS), including moisture, crude ash, crude protein, and crude lipid contents, was determined according to AACC Approved Methods 08-01, 30-10, 44-15A, and 46-13, respectively. The total starch content in the NPS was determined based on AACC method 76-13.01 (AACC, 1995). The amylose content was determined according to the procedure described by Williams et al. (1970). Determination of phosphorus content and degree of substitution Phosphorus (P) contents of NPS and CLPS samples were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission Fig 1. Flow chart for isolation and cross-linking of potato starch. Heo, et al.: Crosslinked potato starch Emir. J. Food Agric ● Vol 29 ● Issue 6 ● 2017 465 spectrometry (ICP-OES(Agilent Technologies, Mulgrave, Australia)) after hot nitric acid digestion. Starch samples (0.3 g) were digested with 10 mL 60 % nitric acid at 180 °C for 2 h. After cooling, they were diluted with 30 mL of distilled water and analyzed using an Agilent 5100 ICP-OES instrument. The degree of substitution (DS) was calculated as follows (Wongsagonsup et al. 2005): DS = 324P/3100 – 96P (1) P: phosphorus content (%) X-ray diffraction X-ray diffraction patterns of NPS and CLPS samples were investigated using a D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (Bruker Co., ÖstlicheRheinbrückenstr, Germany). The samples were scanned from 5° to 40° (2θ). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of NPS and CLPS samples were determined using a Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (Spectrum One System, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Samples were mixed with 100 mg of KBr under anhydrous conditions and recorded over a range of wave numbers from 400 to 4000 cm−1. Swelling factor The swelling factors of the NPS and CLPS samples were determined based on the procedure of Tester and Morrison (1990), with some modifications. The sample (100 mg) was combined with 5 mL of distilled water and incubated in a water bath at 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 °C for 30 min. The mixture was vortexed thoroughly for 5 min. After cooling the sample in an ice bath, 0.5 mL of blue dextran solution (5 mg/mL) was added. The solution was centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 15 min, and the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 620 nm. The swelling factor (SF) was calculated using the following equation: SF w AS AR AS = + × − 1 7 700 , (2) w: sample weight (mg) AS: absorbance of the supernatant AR: absorbance of the reference (without starch) Light transmittance (% T) The clarity of the NPS and CLPS samples was determined according to the method of Reddy and Seib (1999). Starch (0.05 g) was suspended in 5 mL of distilled water in a 15-mL centrifuge tube and placed in a boiling water bath for 30 min, with vortexing every 5 min. After cooling the sample at room temperature, the light transmittance (% T) was read at 650 nm against a distilled water blank. In vitro digestibility The in vitro digestibilities of native and cross-linked potato starches were determined based on the method of Englyst et al. (1992), with slight modifications. To prepare the enzyme solution, pancreatin (1 g) was dissolved in distilled water (12 mL), stirred for 10 min, and then centrifuged at 1500 × g for 10 min. The supernatant (10 mL) and amyloglucosidase (2 mL) were transferred into a beaker and mixed well. The enzyme solution was freshly prepared for each digestibility test. The digestibilities of native and cross-linked potato starches were measured as follows: Sodium acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.2, 0.75 mL), and a glass bead were added to each of the 2 mL micro tubes containing starch samples (30 mg). After equilibration at 37 °C for 10 min, the enzyme solution (0.75 mL) was added to each tube and incubated in the shaking water bath (185 rpm) at 37 °C. The tubes were taken at intervals of 10 and 240 min, boiled for 10 min to stop the enzyme reaction, and centrifuged at 5000 × g for 10 min. The glucose content in the supernatant was measured by the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method (Miller, 1959). The percentage of hydrolyzed starch was calculated by multiplying the glucose content by a factor of 0.9. The percentages RD, slowly SDS, and RS in the samples were calculated using the following equations: RDS (%) = G10 × 0.9 (3) SDS (%) = (G240G10) × 0.9 (4) RS (%) = 100–RDS–SDS (5) Where, G10 and G240 are the glucose contents released after 10 and 240 min, respectively. Statistical analysis All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed according to the general linear models (GLM) procedure to determine the significant differences among the samples. Means were compared according to Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) procedure. Significance was defined at the 5 % level. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Chemical analysis and degree of substitution The chemical composition of the NPS is shown in Table 1. The starch contained 9.47 % moisture, 0.20 % crude ash, 0.50 % crude protein, 0.31 % crude fat, and 86.80 % total starch. The very low contents of protein and fat indicated that the obtained potato starch was very pure and that the residual protein had been thoroughly removed during isolation. The isolated potato starch contained 32.52% amylose and 67.48% amylopectin. The amylose content Heo, et al.: Crosslinked potato starch 466 Emir. J. Food Agric ● Vol 29 ● Issue 6 ● 2017 of potato starch varies from 23 to 31% for potato starch genotypes (Kim et al., 1995; Wiesenborn et al., 1994). The DS was calculated using the phosphorus content of the CLPS and Eq. (1). The DS values for the CLPS samples increased from 5.561 to 36.136 as the concentration of STMP/STPP increased from 0.0125 to 10 % (Table 2). Light transmittance (% T) The light transmittance of the NPS and CLPS pastes is presented in Table 2. The NPS paste showed the highest light transmittance (85.55 %) among all samples. The light transmittance of the CLPS pastes cross-linked with different concentrations (0.0125–5%) of STMP/STPP decreased significantly with increasing concentrations of STMP/ STPP; however, no significant differences were found for the starch pastes treated with more than 5 % of STMP/STPP. These results were consistent with the repor