English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background: The Beers Criteria and STOPP Criteria were developed to identify potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in the geriatric population. Utilization of STOPP Criteria PIMs have shown a significant association with presence of avoidable adverse drug events (ADEs) as compared to utilization of Beers Criteria PIMs. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to utilize STOPP and Beers Criteria to identify PIMs in geriatric patients at an inpatient psychiatric facility, with the goal of implementing a formal process for assessing medication regimens. This process would be expected to decrease adverse outcomes. Methods: Both criteria were used by the pharmacist to identify PIMs and recommendations were made to address the PIMs. A retrospective chart review evaluated whether utilization of the two criteria led to a significant change in number of PIMs and associated adverse outcomes. The primary outcome was the change in number of PIMs for the Beers Criteria versus the STOPP Criteria. Secondary outcomes included the change in number of PIMs, falls, required referrals/transfers, and medication-specific ADEs for each set of criteria assessed separately. Results: Twenty-nine patients met inclusion criteria, and 76 treatment recommendations were made. More PIMs per patient were identified at baseline utilizing STOPP (mean±SD,3.9±2.3) versus Beers Criteria (mean±SD, 2.2±1.3) (p&amp;lt;0.001). The number of PIMs decreased using STOPP (from 112 to 66; mean decrease per patient −1.6±1.5, p&amp;lt;0.0001) and Beers Criteria (from 63 to 23; mean decrease per patient −1.4±1.1, p&amp;lt;0.0001), although the change was not significant for STOPP vs. Beers (p=0.375). All secondary outcomes decreased using both criteria. Conclusions: Utilization of each set of criteria by the pharmacist led to a significant decrease in PIMs and adverse outcomes decreased at follow-up using both criteria. Implementation of a process for assessing medication regimens of geriatric patients utilizing the Beers and/or STOPP Criteria would likely be beneficial to this institution.

the mental health clinician

Application of STOPP Criteria and Beers Criteria in an inpatient psychiatric facility and impact on utilization of potentially inappropriate medications and adverse outcomes