Needleless Closed System Does Not Reduce Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection: A Retrospective Study
Author(s) -
Mitsuru Ishizuka,
Hitoshi Nagata,
Kazutoshi Takagi,
Keiichi Kubota
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
international surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.132
H-Index - 39
eISSN - 2520-2456
pISSN - 0020-8868
DOI - 10.9738/cc132.1
Subject(s) - medicine , central venous catheter , bloodstream infection , catheter , retrospective cohort study , surgery
The needleless closed system (NCS) has been disseminated in several clinical fields to prevent central venous catheter–related bloodstream infection (CVC-RBSI), in place of the conventional Luer cap system (LCS). The purpose of this study is to examine whether NCS is really superior to conventional LCS for prevention of CVC-RBSI. Between May 2002 and December 2008, 1767 patients received CVC in our department. The time interval from insertion to development of CVC-RBSI was compared retrospectively between selected patients who were treated using the conventional LCS (group 1, n = 89, before June 2006) and the NCS (group 2, n = 406, June 2006 and after). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference in the time interval from insertion to development of CVC-RBSI between the two groups. NCS does not reduce CVC-RBSI in adult colorectal cancer patients who undergo CVC insertion.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom