A precise definition of habitat is needed for effective conservation and communication
Author(s) -
Michael J Bamford,
M.C. Calver
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
australian zoologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.267
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 2204-2105
pISSN - 0067-2238
DOI - 10.7882/az.2014.015
Subject(s) - habitat , environmental resource management , computer science , ecology , geography , environmental science , biology
"Habitat" is often used ambiguously in conservation biology and ecology to mean either the specific biotic and abiotic parts of the environment where an organism lives (e.g., the habitat of species x), or to describe a particular environment without reference to a specific species (e.g., the coastal dune habitat). Conservation legislation usually defines habitat as a function of the species, as do botanists, while zoologists are more likely to use habitat to mean a particular environment. We argue that this ambiguity can cause confusion in applied conservation and support defining habitat as "the environment of a species, and particularly those features that determine where the species occurs".
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom