z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
What is the effect of re-introducing a clinical conversation into urgent referral pathways?
Author(s) -
Ivan LeJeune,
Rebecca Sims,
Hugh Porter,
Guy Mansford,
Anastasios Gazis
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
future healthcare journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2514-6653
pISSN - 2514-6645
DOI - 10.7861/futurehosp.4-2-134
Subject(s) - conversation , referral , audit , service (business) , medicine , ambulatory , medical emergency , intensive care medicine , psychology , nursing , business , surgery , communication , accounting , marketing
Demand for assessment at the acute medicine receiving unit (AMRU) regularly exceeded the capacity of the AMRU to assess and treat in a timely way. Audit work suggested that 28% of patients arriving could have had their care delivered in an alternative setting by a service that was already available. The system of referral was redesigned to re-introduce a mandatory GP to consultant clinical conversation to enable navigation of patients to the most appropriate clinical setting. This has relieved pressure on the AMRU and means that patients are directed to the right clinical setting, first time, more of the time. The numbers of patients presenting to the AMRU following such a conversation who could have had care delivered in an alternative setting has dropped below 5%. The ambulatory care rate for the AMRU has been maintained at 43%.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom