z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Quality improvement and emergency laparotomy care: what have we learnt from recent major QI efforts?
Author(s) -
Tim Stephens,
Carolyn Johnston,
Sarah Hare
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
clinical medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.531
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1473-4893
pISSN - 1470-2118
DOI - 10.7861/clinmed.2019.0251
Subject(s) - medicine , laparotomy , audit , context (archaeology) , perioperative , emergency surgery , quality management , emergency department , medical emergency , emergency medicine , health care , intensive care medicine , general surgery , nursing , surgery , operations management , management , paleontology , management system , economics , biology , economic growth
More than 1.53 million adults undergo inpatient surgery in the UK NHS. Patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery have a much greater risk of death than patients admitted for elective surgery. Widespread variations in key standards of care between hospitals exist and are associated with differences in mortality rates.Recently there have been three large-scale initiatives to improve quality of care for emergency laparotomy patients: the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit, the enhanced perioperative care for high-risk patients trial and the Emergency Laparotomy Collaborative. Here we provide a critical review of what we currently know about the use of structured methods for improving the quality of healthcare services, with reference to the three initiatives. We find that using structured methods to improve care is the hallmark of quality improvement but attention must too be paid to the context in which these methods are used.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom