z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
WHY I AM A LUKEWARM ENEMY OF FUNDAMENTALISM
Author(s) -
Douglas Lawrie
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
scriptura
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2305-445X
pISSN - 0254-1807
DOI - 10.7833/99-0-679
Subject(s) - fundamentalism , postmodernity , sympathy , modernity , opposition (politics) , epistemology , sociology , aesthetics , philosophy , political science , law , social psychology , psychology , politics
Assuming that mere opposition to fundamentalism is counter-productive, if not hypocritical, this article calls for an understanding of the question fundamentalism seeks to answer : What is to fill the space between the 'most sacred' and the 'most mundane'? It turns out that we struggle to provide better answers. If, instead of dismissing fundamentalism as a futile reaction against modernity, the ambiguous links between fundamentalism and postmodernity are explored, it is seen that modernity, late capitalism and postmodernity are intertwined in complex ways that defy standard classifications. Fundamentalism poses important questions to the contemporary world and thus deserves some sympathy. The conclusion suggests that we should, nevertheless, prefer to the negativity of fundamentalism sources of affirmation. These may be found in the spaces of the 'most sacred' and the 'most mundane' - but not simply in 'secularity'.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom