English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The Masnavi of Mevlana Rumi is one of the most important works of art that affected the Turkish Literature deeply. With the statements of İsmâîl Rüsûhî-yi Ankaravî, also known as Hazret-i Şârih (the Excellency of the Commentators), the Masnavi is a secret treasure full of essence and gems. Various commentaries and annotations of the Masnavi have been released throughout history in order to facilitate the better understanding of this secret treasure, and make it easier for those who demand these gems of literary essence. The Commentaries of the Masnavi by Ankaravî is best known among these works. This is such an important work that Ahmed Avni Konuk mentions the Commentaries of the Masnavi by Ankaravî as his first source in his work, which is another Commentary for Masnavi by him that was written nearly there hundred years after Ankaravî. Since the explanation and commentating styles of these two commentators are the reflections of their Sufi viewpoints in one sense, handling their viewpoints in a comparative manner will contribute us greatly in our understanding the development of our wisdom. There are two aims in this study. The first one is the comparison of the Sufi viewpoints of Ankaravî and Ahmed Avni Konuk that are stated in the 2nd Volume of their Masnavi Commentaries; the second one is drawing the attention of the researchers to the Commentary of Ankaravî that has not yet been studied in a scientific manner.

İsmâîl Rüsûhî-yi Ankaravî ve Ahmet Avni Konuk'un Tasavvufî Görüşlerinin Mesnevî Şerhi'nin 2. Cildi B