English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this article, passivisation in Old Turkic and Modern Turkish, comparatively is studied within the framework of term-State of Affairs in Functional Grammar. In the eras that are examined in Turkish, It is seen that passivisation, spans a process where the [+control] feature in the State of Affairs designated by the predicate frames turns into [-control]. This change includes the [±telic] subtype and Position, Action, Accomplishment and Activity. The change of feature [+control] turn into [-control] as Presumption; the type of Position State of Affair as State, the Action type as Process and the change of the Accomplishment type as Change are also explained by stativization function of passivisation. Another finding from the corpus is that, the verbs that are passivised generally has the [experience] feature. In Old Turkic and Modern Turkish, passive utterance commonly occurs in the verbs that take the accusative case or absolute case morpheme and have the sementic role of Goal.

The appearance of Passive State of Affairs in Old Turkic and Modern Turkish