Transparency Matters: Kaiser Permanente's National Guideline Program Methodological Processes | Zendy

Carrie M Davino-Ramaya | Zendy; L Kendall Krause | Zendy; Craig Robbins | Zendy; Jeffrey S. Harris | Zendy; M Koster | Zendy; Wiley Chan | Zendy; Gladys I Tom | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Transparency Matters: Kaiser Permanente's National Guideline Program Methodological Processes

Author(s) -

Carrie M Davino-Ramaya,

L Kendall Krause,

Craig Robbins,

Jeffrey S. Harris,

M Koster,

Wiley Chan,

Gladys I Tom

Publication year - 2012

Publication title -

the permanente journal

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.445

H-Index - 30

eISSN - 1552-5775

pISSN - 1552-5767

DOI - 10.7812/tpp/11-134

Subject(s) - systematic review , medicine , guideline , checklist , grading (engineering) , critical appraisal , evidence based medicine , medline , quality (philosophy) , multidisciplinary approach , management science , process management , alternative medicine , psychology , pathology , business , political science , law , social science , philosophy , civil engineering , epistemology , sociology , economics , cognitive psychology , engineering

The practice-guideline process of collecting, critically appraising, and synthesizing available evidence, then developing expert panel recommendations based on appraised evidence, makes it possible to provide high-quality care for patients. Unwanted variability in the quality and rigor of evidence summaries and Clinical Practice Guidelines has been a long-standing challenge for clinicians seeking evidence-based guidance to support patient care decisions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research