z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
What Was a University Press?
Author(s) -
Doug Armato
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
against the grain
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2380-176X
pISSN - 1043-2094
DOI - 10.7771/2380-176x.6247
Subject(s) - media studies , sociology
How much can we turn the screw on counter-examples to the KK principle? The principle, also sometimes called “positive introspection”, says that if one knows that P, one knows that one knows that P. It is widely, although not universally, acknowledged that the KK principle is false, and not just for the boring reason that one can know that P without having formed the belief that one knows that P. One can know that P, and believe that one knows that P, without knowing that one knows that P, because one is not in a strong enough epistemic position to know that one knows that P (Williamson 2000: 11430). One’s epistemic position is weaker with respect to the fact that one knows that P than it is with respect to the fact that P itself. But how much weaker can one’s epistemic position be with respect to the fact that one knows that P than it is with respect to the fact that P? Of course, if one does know that P, one’s epistemic position with respect to the fact that one knows that P cannot be so bad that one positively knows that one does not know that P, as opposed to merely failing to know that one knows that P, for knowing is

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom