z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Pros and Cons of Compulsory Licensing: An Analysis of Arguments
Author(s) -
Muhammad Zaheer Abbas
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
international journal of social science and humanity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2010-3646
DOI - 10.7763/ijssh.2013.v3.239
Subject(s) - monopoly , trips agreement , safeguard , trips architecture , law and economics , product (mathematics) , business , work (physics) , intellectual property , patent law , law , economics , international trade , political science , market economy , engineering , mechanical engineering , geometry , mathematics , transport engineering
Patents provide monopoly rights to patent owners to manufacture, sell, and import the product resulting in overpricing of the patented products. Without patents, the inventors and innovators can neither be adequately compensated for their costs of research nor be encouraged or motivated for further research to develop new and improved products. Patent protection is therefore accepted as a necessary evil despite its conflict with the competitions laws and human rights law (in case of pharmaceutical patents). This work analyzes arguments of both opponents and proponents of compulsory licensing which is a legitimate safeguard provided under TRIPS to check misuse of monopoly right and to deal with situations of public health crisis especially in the third world

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom