z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: a randomised controlled trial
Author(s) -
Genevieve McArthur,
Saskia Kohnen,
Kristy Jones,
Philippa Eve,
Erin Banales,
Linda Larsen,
Anne Castles
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
peerj
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.927
H-Index - 70
ISSN - 2167-8359
DOI - 10.7717/peerj.922
Subject(s) - phonics , fluency , word (group theory) , reading (process) , psychology , dyslexia , word recognition , audiology , computer science , medicine , linguistics , mathematics education , primary education , philosophy
Given the importance of effective treatments for children with reading impairment, paired with growing concern about the lack of scientific replication in psychological science, the aim of this study was to replicate a quasi-randomised trial of sight word and phonics training using a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. One group of poor readers ( N = 41) did 8 weeks of phonics training (i.e., phonological decoding) and then 8 weeks of sight word training (i.e., whole-word recognition). A second group did the reverse order of training. Sight word and phonics training each had a large and significant valid treatment effect on trained irregular words and word reading fluency. In addition, combined sight word and phonics training had a moderate and significant valid treatment effect on nonword reading accuracy and fluency. These findings demonstrate the reliability of both phonics and sight word training in treating poor readers in an era where the importance of scientific reliability is under close scrutiny.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom