z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Wedge resection is equal to segmental resection for pulmonary typical carcinoid patients at localized stage: a population-based analysis
Author(s) -
Tao Yan,
Kai Wang,
Jichang Liu,
Yukai Zeng,
Fenglong Bie,
Guanghui Wang,
Jiajun Du
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
peerj
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.927
H-Index - 70
ISSN - 2167-8359
DOI - 10.7717/peerj.7519
Subject(s) - wedge resection , medicine , stage (stratigraphy) , proportional hazards model , lung cancer , adenocarcinoma , radiology , propensity score matching , multivariate analysis , survival analysis , subgroup analysis , population , univariate analysis , surgery , oncology , cancer , resection , meta analysis , paleontology , environmental health , biology
Background Medical institutions worldwide have not reached a consensus on what surgery is the most advisable for pulmonary typical carcinoid (TC) patients at the localized stage. This research focuses on exploring whether wedge resection or segmental resection is the superior option. Methods The demographic and clinical information of 1,887 TC patients diagnosed at the localized stage from 2004 to 2015 was collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Patient prognosis was evaluated by KM curves. The chi-square test was used to examine the variation between different groups that would be eliminated by propensity score matching (PSM). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analyses were used to evaluate prognostic values of relative factors. Results The prognosis of TC was the most favorable for patients suffering from pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma (ADC), and pulmonary carcinoids (PCs). The choice to have surgery, not the type of surgery chosen, was the most significant independent prognostic factor correlated with overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-special survival (LCSS). The prognostic result of the comparison between wedge resection and segmental resection was not statistically significant before or after PSM. In subgroup analysis, the inference still held.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom