z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparing a non-invasive hemodynamic monitor with minimally invasive monitoring during major open abdominal surgery
Author(s) -
Lawrence Ong,
Hong Liu
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of biomedical research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 31
eISSN - 2352-4685
pISSN - 1674-8301
DOI - 10.7555/jbr.28.20140005
Subject(s) - medicine , perioperative , hemodynamics , abdominal surgery , invasive surgery , surgery , anesthesia
As part of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, the goal-directed fluid management with hemodynamic monitoring can effectively guide perioperative fluid use and significantly improve the outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing major surgeries. Several minimally invasive and non-invasive monitoring devices are commercially available for clinical use. As part of an internal evaluation, we reported the results from three different hemodynamic monitoring devices used in a patient undergoing a major abdominal surgery.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom