Comparing a non-invasive hemodynamic monitor with minimally invasive monitoring during major open abdominal surgery
Author(s) -
Lawrence Ong,
Hong Liu
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of biomedical research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 31
eISSN - 2352-4685
pISSN - 1674-8301
DOI - 10.7555/jbr.28.20140005
Subject(s) - medicine , perioperative , hemodynamics , abdominal surgery , invasive surgery , surgery , anesthesia
As part of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, the goal-directed fluid management with hemodynamic monitoring can effectively guide perioperative fluid use and significantly improve the outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing major surgeries. Several minimally invasive and non-invasive monitoring devices are commercially available for clinical use. As part of an internal evaluation, we reported the results from three different hemodynamic monitoring devices used in a patient undergoing a major abdominal surgery.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom