z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Why Should Parliaments Continue to Debate?: The Intertwined Virtues of Parliamentary Debates
Author(s) -
Olivier Rozenberg
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
redescriptions political thought conceptual history and feminist theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2308-0914
pISSN - 2308-0906
DOI - 10.7227/r.21.2.4
Subject(s) - anachronism , credibility , politics , ideology , political science , variety (cybernetics) , diversity (politics) , accountability , law , law and economics , political economy , sociology , artificial intelligence , computer science
Parliamentary debates may seem as anachronistic today given their limited role in forging majorities within parliaments. Yet, this paper seeks to demonstrate that they still play a diversity of other roles. They contribute to frame ideologically a debate and therefore to link policy proposal to electoral politics. They can also be regarded as ways of both controlling and motivating members. They bring credibility to the view that parliaments are representative – feeding people mimetic relations to politics. Last, they help implementing the accountability process forcing ministers to speak, to listen to criticisms and to answer them. Those four aspects, based on a variety of literature, are considered to be still relevant in the contemporary period.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom