Submitting “Alternative Facts” to Debate: A Weberian Perspective on Post-truth Politics
Author(s) -
Кари Палонен
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
redescriptions political thought conceptual history and feminist theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2308-0914
pISSN - 2308-0906
DOI - 10.7227/r.21.2.2
Subject(s) - perspective (graphical) , politics , epistemology , political science , sociology , philosophy , law , computer science , artificial intelligence
Oxford Dictionaries chose “post-truth” as the “Word of the Year 2016”, while the association of German linguists (Gesellschaft fur deutsche Sprache) did the same for “postfaktische Politik”. “Alternative facts”, launched by Kellyanne Conway concerning the attendance at Donald Trump’s inaugural, was a third variant in this cluster. In this article, I shall discuss Max Weber’s parliamentary perspective on the critique of given facts and of the powers of science in relation to the debates around post-truth politics. A critical assessment of Leo Strauss’s critique of Weber as a nihilist and relativist introduces the problematic. One aim of the article is to illustrate how even trivial slogans can be situated in the history of political concepts, political theory and rhetoric.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom