z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Åland Islands Question in the League of Nations: The Ideal Minority Case?
Author(s) -
Sia Spiliopoulou Åkermark
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
redescriptions political thought conceptual history and feminist theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2308-0914
pISSN - 2308-0906
DOI - 10.7227/r.13.1.10
Subject(s) - politics , rhetoric , conceptual history , political philosophy , sociology , ideal (ethics) , contingency , epistemology , rhetorical question , agency (philosophy) , focus (optics) , social science , political science , law , linguistics , philosophy , physics , optics
This paper argues that the Aland Islands case, which was one of the first critical test cases brought before the at the time newly established intergovernmental organization called the League of Nations, has contributed considerably in shaping our modern understanding of what is a minority, emphasizing racial or national minorities. It has shaped our understanding of what is a minority issue, framed as an issue concerning the preservation of cultural identity, as a question concerning peace and security and, finally, as a matter of the right of self-determination. It is further argued that the Aland Islands case formulated the basic guidelines for how such a minority issue can be solved – emphasizing the international character of the dispute while balancing with the principle of respect for national sovereignty and internal affairs. In the title of this paper the term ‘ideal’ is used in the sense of ‘typical’ and ‘paradigmatic’ since most of the arguments forwarded by the parties as well as the very method of dispute solution have created a paradigm in the field of minority protection.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom