z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Living the Curriculum Review: Perspectives from Three Leaders
Author(s) -
Jennifer Lock,
S. Laurie Hill,
Patti Dyjur
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
canadian journal of higher education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2293-6602
pISSN - 0316-1218
DOI - 10.7202/1050845ar
Subject(s) - curriculum , process (computing) , quality assurance , medical education , curriculum development , curriculum mapping , higher education , quality (philosophy) , engineering ethics , sociology , public relations , pedagogy , psychology , political science , business , computer science , medicine , engineering , marketing , philosophy , epistemology , law , service (business) , operating system
A requirement for quality assurance is becoming more prevalent in higher education today as institutions are being asked to demonstrate that they are providing robust, meaningful learning experiences for students. Many institutions are adopting curriculum review frameworks as part of their overall quality assurance strategy. Three leaders at various levels who were engaged in a year-long curriculum review process share reflections about their experiences and challenges while conducting an undergraduate program review. Their theoretical framework for an effective curriculum review process is shared in this paper. The leaders offer institutional, faculty, and course level insights, and make five recommendations for a collaborative curriculum review process: (1) setting clear expectations; (2) maintaining open, consistent communication; (3) incorporating multiple levels of leadership; (4) engaging various groups of stakeholders; and (5) implementing through actionable items.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom