Transferring landscape values using discrete choice experiments: Is meta-analysis an option?
Author(s) -
Amaia de Ayala,
Petr Mariel,
Jürgen Meyerhoff
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
economía agraria y recursos naturales
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2174-7350
pISSN - 1578-0732
DOI - 10.7201/earn.2014.01.06
Subject(s) - valuation (finance) , willingness to pay , choice modelling , contingent valuation , discrete choice , context (archaeology) , cost–benefit analysis , computer science , meta analysis , budget constraint , operations research , environmental economics , environmental resource management , actuarial science , economics , management science , econometrics , microeconomics , business , marketing , accounting , geography , mathematics , political science , archaeology , law , medicine
Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) is an increasingly used valuation method to guide policy-makers in their landscape management decision-making. However, due to time and budget constraints, conducting an original DCE for every single policy decision may not be possible in practice. In this context, meta-analyses are becoming a popular tool for supporting benefit transfer in environmental valuation. This paper raises the question whether meta-analysis is an option for transferring landscape values using DCEs within Europe. We argue that the use of specific and different attributes, definitions and units of measurement makes it hard to compare willingness-to-pay values across current DCE studies
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom