Open AccessComparison of Mixed H 2 /H∞ with Regional Pole Placement Control and H 2 Optimal Control for the Design of Steam Condenser
Author(s) -
Mustefa Jibril
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
innovative systems design and engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2222-1727
DOI - 10.7176/isde/11-3-04
Subject(s) - condenser (optics) , surface condenser , settling time , controller (irrigation) , control theory (sociology) , engineering , steam electric power station , pid controller , superheated steam , mechanical engineering , control engineering , computer science , step response , control (management) , steam turbine , temperature control , physics , turbine , biology , artificial intelligence , agronomy , light source , combined cycle , optics
This paper investigates the comparison between mixed H 2 /H∞ with regional pole placement control and H 2 optimal control for the design of steam condenser. The comparison have been made for a step change in the steam condenser pressure set point for a step change of 10 & 23 seconds using MATLAB/Simulink environment for the steam condenser with mixed H 2 /H∞ with regional pole placement controller, steam condenser with H 2 optimal controller and steam condenser without controller. The steam condenser with mixed H 2 /H∞ with regional pole placement controller presented excellent and superior dynamic performance in response to the two step changes and an improvement in settling time. The overall simulation results demonstrated that the steam condenser with mixed H 2 /H∞ with regional pole placement controller can be an efficient alternative to the steam condenser with H 2 optimal controller for the steam condenser.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom