z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Danni cerebrali neonatali: la fallacia del post hoc ergo propter hoc
Author(s) -
Marina Magini,
Francesca Ingravallo,
A Cicognani
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
pratica medica and aspetti legali
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2283-4044
pISSN - 1973-4824
DOI - 10.7175/pmeal.v1i2.416
Subject(s) - causation , medicine , medical malpractice , malpractice , psychiatry , psychology , medical emergency , law , political science
Perinatal cerebral injury is an important subject in medical malpractice litigation. In most cases of claims for neonatal injuries the Italian Courts sentence the medical or hospital liability. The authors present a case of obstetrical negligence claim, in which parents alleged the severe mental retardation of their term born infant to negligence during labour. Although the most part of severe mental retardation is not the result of intrapartum injuries, the official expert call upon to judge established causation and identified the breach of duty in negligence in intermittent auscultation of foetal heart rate during labour. The authors underline that the research on the causation of neonatal cerebral injuries needs to focus more on antenatal events and reckon the causation not determinable in this case, lacking markers of the time of onset of brain injury, exclusion of other causes of mental retardation, and enough evidence to evaluate the use of foetal heart rate monitoring for assessment of its well being. The official expert’s conclusions are an example of post hoc fallacy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom