z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A remark on the (2,2)-domination number
Author(s) -
Torsten Korneffel,
Dirk Meierling,
Lutz Volkmann
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
discussiones mathematicae graph theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.476
H-Index - 19
eISSN - 2083-5892
pISSN - 1234-3099
DOI - 10.7151/dmgt.1411
Subject(s) - combinatorics , mathematics , conjecture , vertex (graph theory) , dominating set , graph , connectivity , discrete mathematics
A subset D of the vertex set of a graph G is a (k; p)-dominating set if every vertex v 2 V (G) n D is within distance k to at least p vertices in D. The parameter k;p(G) denotes the minimum cardinality of a (k; p)-dominating set of G. In 1994, Bean, Henning and Swart posed the conjecture that k;p(G) p p+k n(G) for any graph G with k(G) k + p 1, where the latter means that every vertex is within distance k to at least k + p 1 vertices other than itself. In 2005, Fischermann and Volkmann conrmed this conjecture for all integers k and p for the case that p is a multiple of k. In this paper we show that 2;2(G) (n(G) + 1)=2 for all connected graphs G and characterize all connected graphs with 2;2 = (n+1)=2. This means that for k = p = 2 we characterize all connected graphs for which the conjecture is true without the precondition that 2 3.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom