Ocular motility changes after inferomedial wall and balanced medial plus lateral wall orbital decompression in Graves' orbitopathy: a randomized prospective comparative study
Author(s) -
Cristiane de Almeida Leite,
Thaís de Sousa Pereira,
Jeane Chiang,
Rodrigo Bernal Moritz,
Allan Christian Pieroni Gonçalves,
Mário Luiz Ribeiro Monteiro
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
clinics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.618
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1980-5322
pISSN - 1807-5932
DOI - 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2592
Subject(s) - medicine , medial rectus muscle , exophthalmos , esotropia , medial wall , extraocular muscles , diplopia , strabismus surgery , strabismus , lateral rectus muscle , graves' ophthalmopathy , decompression , ocular motility disorders , lateral wall , surgery , ophthalmology , eye movement , graves' disease , thyroid , mechanical engineering , engineering
OBJECTIVES: To compare the surgical outcomes of inferomedial wall orbital decompression (IM-OD) and balanced medial plus lateral wall orbital decompression (ML-OD) in patients with inactive Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) with regard to exophthalmos reduction and ocular motility abnormalities. METHODS: Forty-two patients with inactive GO eligible for OD were randomly assigned to either the IM-OD or ML-OD groups. Pre and postoperative evaluations included Hertel exophthalmometry, sensory, and motor extraocular motility assessment, standardized photographs in the nine gaze positions, and computed tomography (CT) of the orbits. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03278964. RESULTS: Exophthalmometry reduction was statistically significant in both groups ( p <0.001), but was greater in the ML-OD group ( p =0.010). New-onset esotropia occurred in 11.1% and 23.5% of patients who underwent IM-OD and ML-OD, respectively, with no statistically significant difference in the frequency of pre and postoperative strabismus in either group. The mean increase in preoperative esotropia was 24±6.9 and 12±8.8 prism diopters in patients who underwent IM-OD and ML-OD, respectively. In the IM-OD group, abduction and elevation worsened at the first ( p <0.05) and third ( p <0.05) postoperative visits but were restored at 6 months. The versions did not change postoperatively with ML-OD. The preoperative CT-measured medial rectus muscle area predicted new-onset strabismus ( p =0.023). Significant postoperative medial rectus muscle enlargement occurred in both groups ( p <0.001). Restriction in elevation and abduction was significantly associated with enlarged inferior ( p =0.007) and medial rectus muscle areas ( p =0.002). CONCLUSIONS: IM-OD is as safe as ML-OD with regard to new-onset strabismus, and represents a good alternative for patients who do not require significant exophthalmos reduction. ML-OD offers greater exophthalmos reduction and smoother postoperative recovery. Patients with preoperative enlarged medial rectus muscle on CT are at risk for new-onset esotropia, and preoperative esotropia is likely to increase after OD.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom