La independencia y el gobierno de los jueces. Un debate constitucional
Author(s) -
Pablo Lucas Murillo de la Cueva
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
teoría y realidad constitucional
Language(s) - Spanish
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.232
H-Index - 7
eISSN - 2174-8950
pISSN - 1139-5583
DOI - 10.5944/trc.40.2017.20911
Subject(s) - humanities , political science , competence (human resources) , independence (probability theory) , law , sociology , philosophy , psychology , social psychology , mathematics , statistics
El articulo defiende la independencia de los jueces espanoles aunque buena parte de la opinion publica no la perciba. Tambien aboga por el mantenimiento del Consejo General del Poder Judicial si bien considera necesario que en la eleccion de todos los vocales por las Cortes se observe la exigencia constitucional de que recaiga en jueces y juristas de reconocida competencia y demostrada capacidad de mantener su criterio. Although not perceived by a great part of the public opinion, the text affirms the independence of the Spanish Judges. Also defends the General Council of the Judiciary but maintains that their members must be elected by the Cortes among judges and jurists of acknowledged competence and proven ability for sustaining their own criteria.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom