English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Espana contempla una medida de inmunidad adicional para altas autoridades, funcionarios y cargos publicos consistente en el conocimiento por un tribunal superior al ordinario legal de las causas contra ellos en caso de haber cometido delito, llamada aforamiento, que es practicamente inexistente en el mundo juridico occidental al que nuestro pais pertenece. Ademas, su extension es vergonzosa, pues estan aforadas mas de 250.000 autoridades, funcionarios y cargos publicos, lo que la hace indefendible ante el ciudadano normal. Es ademas inconstitucional, por las razones que explicamos en el texto, ya que representa un privilegio vulnerador del principio de igualdad. En este articulo se propone su drastica reduccion, dejando aforadas como maximo a dos figuras constitucionales, el Jefe del Estado y el Jefe del Gobierno, para lo que evidentemente hay que reformar la Constitucion. Spain contemplates an additional measure of immunity for high authorities, civil servants and public officers, which consists on being tried by a court that is superior to the legal ordinary one, in case that they have committed a felony. This figure, known as «aforamiento», is practically inexistent in the western legal culture to which our country belongs. Furthermore, its extension is shameful, since more than 250.000 high authorities, civil servants and public officers benefit from this privilege, making it indefensible before normal citizens. It is also unconstitutional for the reasons we explain in this paper, because it represents a privilege that is contrary to the principle of equality before the law. This study proposes a drastic reduction, maintaining the privilege for a maximum of two constitutional figures, the head of state and the head of government, a purpose that evidently requires a constitutional reform.

teoría y realidad constitucional/teoría y realidad constitucional

Privilegios procesales inconstitucionales e innecesarios en la España democrática del siglo XXI: el sorprendente mantenimiento de la institución del aforamiento