Reflexiones a la luz de la sentencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en el caso Hirsi Jamaa y otros contra Italia : (sentencia de 23 de febrero de 2012) , derechos de los inmigrantes en situación irregular en España = Reflections of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case Hirsi Jamaa and others vItaly : (judgment of 23 february 2012) , rights of migrants in an irregular situation in Spain | Zendy

Juan Antonio Carrillo Salcedo | Zendy

Open Access

Reflexiones a la luz de la sentencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en el caso Hirsi Jamaa y otros contra Italia : (sentencia de 23 de febrero de 2012) , derechos de los inmigrantes en situación irregular en España = Reflections of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case Hirsi Jamaa and others vItaly : (judgment of 23 february 2012) , rights of migrants in an irregular situation in Spain

Author(s) -

Juan Antonio Carrillo Salcedo

Publication year - 2013

Publication title -

teoría y realidad constitucional

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.232

H-Index - 7

eISSN - 2174-8950

pISSN - 1139-5583

DOI - 10.5944/trc.32.2013.11789

Subject(s) - tribunal , political science , humanities , derecho , human rights , law , philosophy

The professor Carrillo Salcedo meditates on the duty of protection of the States that derives of the human rights guaranteed by the juridical international classification and its protection in so diverse environments as the right to the attendance doctor pharmacist of the irregular immigrants and the protection in front of the extradition of the accused of diffusing State's secrets.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research