English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

En este trabajo Hasso Hofmann, desde un analisis juridico constitucional, pero tambien politologico analiza las reformas que ha experimentado la constitucion alemana de 1949 en sus 50 primeros anos de existencia. Llega, entre otras, a la conclusion de que en muchos ambitos ha habido mas mutacion que reforma constitucional en sentido estricto y que termina siendo dificil distinguirlas a partir de la correlacion existente entre ellas. Tambien concluye que, a la luz del numero de reformas realizadas y su funcionalidad politica, se podria considerar a la Ley Fundamental de Bonn mas una constitucion flexible que rigida, por lo que las mayorias cualificadas para la reforma constitucional no constituyen un obstaculo importante a la decision del Parlamento, y la semejanza de la reforma constitucional con las decisiones politicas ordinarias abren aun mas la brecha existente entre proceso constituyente y proceso de reforma constitucional. This paper is a constitutional analysis, but also a political science analysis, of reforms on the German Constitution since 1949. This analysis concluded that in many cases it has been more constitutional «mutations» than formal reforms, and that it is difficult to distinguish both kind of changes. Due to the number of reforms and its effects, it is possible to consider that the German Constitution is a flexible constitution: the special majority required is not a real obstacle to the parliament decision; and the decision to reform the constitution and an ordinary decision are very similar, therefore there is a serious rift between constituent process and reform process.

Reformas de la Ley Fundamental : experiencias de medio siglo