English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Trabajo bibliograico donde en la introduccion analizo, brevemente, lo que juridicamente para la historia del Derecho Procesal Espanol supuso el texto de las Partidas, especialmente, la Tercera que es esencial para los estudiosos del Proceso civil por lo que represento en su epoca y porque fue la columna vertebral del Proceso civil Espanol desde el s. XIII hasta casi diriamos el s. XXI. Despues abordo el metodo romanista del «mos italicus» –recibido de Italia en el siglo XIII, que consiste en aplicar al Derecho la dialectica de la Filosofia Escolastica– en las obras juridicas de los autores Espanoles sobre Derecho Real o Nacional vigente es decir de Derecho Civil, Penal o Procesal de los s. XVI a XVIII y sus resultados; y la razon de que su influencia fuera menor en el Derecho mercantil por su base consuetudinaria. Tambien se aborda el metodo del «mos gallicus» que aplica la esencia de la Filosofia Humanista al Derecho y que tuvo menor influencia en las obras juridicas de estos siglos salvo en el Derecho Politico y su filosofia justificadora del Estado Absolutista Monarquico y en el Derecho Internacional sobre la conquista de America; metodo mas reinado que el anterior y donde sus defensores estan cerca del Poder Politico imperante. En la segunda mitad del s. XVIII el «mos italicus» aplicado al Derecho Real o Nacional vigente se ve poco a poco desplazado, sustituido y modificado por el influjo del pensamiento Racionalista Ilustrado y el Enciclopedismo. Trato de dar relevancia a las obras de Derecho Procesal al abordar este trabajo. Acompano para destacar la importancia de las afirmaciones realizadas y como base de ellas dos indices de autores y sus obras juridicas –en todo caso incompletos– referidos uno a los s. XVI y XVII y otro a los s. XVIII y XIX y asi extraer conclusiones precisas. Bibliographical work where in the introduction I analyze, brief, what juridically for the history of the Spanish procedural law there supposed the text of the Partidas, specially, the Third one that is essential for the experts of the civil process for what it represented in his epoch and because it was the vertebral column of the civil Spanish process from The XIIIth Century until almost we would say The XXIst Century. Later I approach the method romanist of «mos italicus» received of Italy in The XIIIth Century that consists of applying to the Law the dialectics of the Scholastic Philosophy and his repercussion in the juridical works of the authors Spanish referred to the Royal Law or in force Native is Civil, Penal or Procedural from. The XVIth the XVIIIth Centuries and his results; and the minor influence that had on the commercial law for his customary base. Also the method approaches of «mos gallicus» that applies the essence of the Humanist Philosophy to the Law and that had minor it influences in the juridical works of these centuries except in the Constitutional law and his philosophy to justify the Absolutist Monarchic State and in the International Law on the conquest of America; method more reined than the previous one and where his defenders are near the Political commanding Power. In the second half of The XVIIIth Century «mos italicus» « applied to the Royal Law or in force Native meets little by little displaced, replaced and modified for the influence of the racionalist illustrated thought and that of the encyclopedic. I try to give importance to the works of procedural law on having approached this work. I emphasize the importance of the afirmations accompanying as base two indexes of authors and of his juridical works –though always incompletes– recounted one to the XVI and the XVIIth Centuries and other one to The XVIII and XIXth Centuries in order that other investigators adopt precise conclusions.

Notas sobre bibliografía jurídica española. S. XVI a XIX. Segunda parte = Notes on legal Spanish bibliography. The XVIth to XIXth centuries