English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

En el sistema juridico mexicano, especificamente en lo referente a las responsabilidades de los servidores publicos, la influencia del derecho espanol es claro; siendo su antecedente el juicio de residencia, que tenia como funcion principal sancionar a los funcionarios que ocupaban un cargo publico en las tierras conquistadas y que se desempenaban en contravencion a las disposiciones emitidas por la corona espanola. El objetivo principal era la sancion a los servidores por el mal desempeno de las funciones encomendadas. En el juicio de responsabilidad de los servidores publicos en Mexico, la finalidad es la misma que el de residencia espanola, incluso con sanciones similares a las de este ultimo, las cuales son desde la amonestacion hasta la inhabilitacion para ocupar un cargo publico. Mucho se ha comentado con relacion a que el juicio de residencia espanol, es el antecedente del juicio de amparo mexicano, sin embargo no lo considero asi, pues el juicio de amparo tiene como objetivo principal el resarcir a los individuos en la violacion de sus derechos humanos cuando alguna autoridad los ha vulnerado, es decir el juicio de amparo gira en la proteccion del individuo, mientras que el juicio de residencia gira en torno a la evaluacion del desempeno del funcionario, pues esta dirigido a sancionarlo por su mal desempeno; de ahi que considero no exista relacion directa entre ambos procedimientos. In the Mexican legal system, specifically regarding the responsabilities of government employees, the influence of the Spanish law is clear, being it´s precedent the residence trial, which main function was to punish officers who held public office in conquered lands and violated dispositions issued by the Spanish crown. The main objective was to punish public officers for their poor fulfillment of the assigned functions. The Mexican liability of public officers trial has the same purpose as the Spanish residence trial, it even has similar sanctions which can go from admonitions to becoming ineligible for public office. Much has been said regarding the fact that the Mexican amparo trial (protection of civil liberties) finds its precedents on the Spanish residence trial, however I must disagree, mainly because the amparo´s trial main objective is to compensate the individuals for suffering violations to their human rights by any authority, in other words the amparo trial is mainly about the individual´s protection, while the residence trial focuses on the performance evaluation of the officers, for it aims to sanction the officers for their performance; therefore I do not consider there is a direct relation between both procedures.

El juicio de residencia español, antecedente del juicio de responsabilidad y no del juicio de amparo mexicano