English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

La analogia entre juicio y arbitraje compromisario de tipo privado, trae su origen del Derecho Romano, y concretamente de un texto del jurista Paulo que cabe considerar como el punto de partida de la actual conformacion del arbitraje como «equivalente jurisdiccional». With regard to the formation of arbitration in the likeness of trial.Theanalogy between thetrial and theprivate compromisary arbitration has roots in the Roman Law. It appeared for the first time in a text written by the jurist Paulo which can be considered as the starting point of the current conception of arbitration as a jurisdictional equivalent.

Del arbitraje romano configurado «a semejanza de los juicios» «compromisso quod iudicium imitatur»