English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Resumen Como es sabido, el Tribunal Supremo ha mostrado en algunas ocasiones una profunda discrepancia con resoluciones emanadas del Tribunal Constitucional. En este trabajo se defiende la critica leal de los tribunales a la doctrina vinculante de otros que les viene impuesta por nuestro ordenamiento, siempre que se haga en el marco de su actuacion jurisdiccional y se acepte su vinculacion con dicha doctrina. Se critica, por el contrario, la adopcion de medidas ajenas a dicha funcion (pedir el amparo del Rey, adoptar acuerdos plenarios de dudosa naturaleza juridica), la negativa a asumir esa jurisprudencia y el intento de controlar la actuacion jurisdiccional de los Magistrados del Tribunal Constitucional. Se concluye afirmando que dicha tension es, en cierta medida, inevitable, y que debe apelarse a la prudencia del Tribunal Constitucional en su actuacion y a la lealtad institucional de los tribunales ordinarios en su labor. Abstract As it is known, the Supreme Court has sometimes showed up a deep disagreement with some of the constitutional precedent. In one hand, this paper defends the Judiciary trustworthy criticism with them, assuming the mandatory links that the Law establishes between rulings. On the other hand, it is not reliable other actions that have little to do with the jurisdictional function (asking for Royal assessment, ruling some uncertain regulations), also meaning refusing to accept that legal body, or/and trying to control the jurisdictional activity of the Constitutional Judges. The conclusion is that some sort of strain is unavoidable, calling to the care and prudence of the Constitutional Court rulings, also to the institutional loyalty of the Judiciary.

Las tensas relaciones entre el Tribunal Supremo y el Tribunal Constitucional y los límites de la (legítima) discrepancia entre ellos