English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The use by the Spanish Constitutional Court of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights may raise some criticism when the result is the reduction of the level of protection given to a fundamental right according to the domestic constitutional system. This may be the case of STC 34/2011, grounded on ECtHR judgment in Lautsi II, but without taking into account that it relies on the Member State’s margin of appreciation and that the ECHR only provides a minimum standard of protection. In opposition to that line of reasoning, the negative side of religious freedom and the neutrality of the State in religious matters are emphasized as relevant domestic constitutional arguments to analyze the presence of crucifixes on state school walls in Spain.

Margen de apreciación estatal, libertad religiosa y crucifijos (o las consecuencias de un deficiente diálogo entre jurisdicciones)