English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

State Judge’s acting as arbitrators has been a topic of inquiry that has remained undetected by the doctrine. This is due principally to two main reasons; the first reason is that it has been a conduct considered unlikely to this moment. Secondly, negative legal effects can be foreseen. However, this acquires relevance because an arbitral procedure with these characteristics happened in Mexico. The topic is addressed in the present article with the main goal of establishing well-supported bases that allows us to consider this activity as contrary, or incompatible with the public policy. This is a matter of great importance because it allows us to establish a principle consisting in that any arbitral resolution rendered by a state judge must be considered a cause of nullity. La actuacion de los jueces estatales en calidad de arbitros ha sido un tema de estudio obviado por la doctrina. Existen dos razones principales para ello; la primera consiste en que se trata de una conducta que hasta el momento ha sido considerada improbable. En segundo termino, porque ese desempeno previsiblemente puede causar efectos antijuridicos. Sin embargo, la cuestion cobra interes despues de que recientemente se suscito un procedimiento arbitral con esa caracteristica en Mexico. En el presente articulo se hace aborda el tema con el objeto de establecer bases bien sustentadas que permitan considerar esa actividad como contraria al orden publico. La cuestion es de trascendencia porque permite establecer un principio consistente en que una resolucion arbitral dictada por un juez estatal incurre en la causal de nulidad del laudo arbitral.

comunitania

La actuación de los jueces estatales como árbitros privados : un problema de orden público = State Judge’s acting as private arbitrators : a public policy problem