z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of Microhardness and Compressive Strength of Alkasite and Conventional Restorative Materials
Author(s) -
Kunho Lee,
Jong-Soo Kim,
Jisun Shin,
Mi-Ran Han
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the journal of the korean academy of pedtatric dentistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2288-3819
pISSN - 1226-8496
DOI - 10.5933/jkapd.2020.47.3.320
Subject(s) - indentation hardness , compressive strength , glass ionomer cement , materials science , composite material , universal testing machine , vickers hardness test , cement , composite number , ultimate tensile strength , microstructure
The aim of this study was to compare compressive strength and microhardness of recently introduced alkasite restorative materials with glass ionomer cement and flowable composite resin. For each material, 20 samples were prepared respectively for compressive strength and Vickers microhardness test. The compressive strength was measured with universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. And microhardness was measured using Vickers Micro hardness testing machine under 500 g load and 10 seconds dwelling time at 1 hour, 1 day, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days and 35 days. The compressive strength was highest in composite resin, followed by alkasite, and glass ionomer cement. In microhardness test, composite resin, which had no change throughout experimental periods, showed highest microhardness in 1 hour, 1 day, and 7 days measurement. The glass ionomer cement showed increase in microhardness for 7 days and no difference was found with composite resin after 14 days measurement. For alkasite, maximum microhardness was measured on 14 days, but showed gradual decrease.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom