Decision-making for use of complementary and alternative therapies by pregnant women and nurse midwives during pregnancy: An exploratory qualitative study
Author(s) -
Marie HastingsTolsma
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
international journal of nursing and midwifery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2141-2456
DOI - 10.5897/ijnm2013.0100
Subject(s) - pregnancy , medicine , alternative medicine , focus group , exploratory research , family medicine , qualitative research , nursing , mainstream , obstetrics , social science , philosophy , genetics , theology , pathology , marketing , sociology , anthropology , business , biology
Millions of people use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies. Such therapies are used across a wide spectrum of health conditions, but the use is particularly notable during pregnancy. Despite the widespread use, little is known about the perceptions of patients and clinicians in deciding about use of varied therapies. This study describes pregnant women and obstetrical provider (nurse midwives) perceptions in decision-making for use of CAM therapies during pregnancy. Pregnant women and nurse midwives were interviewed in focus groups with transcribed data analyzed using content analysis. Four themes emerged from the session with pregnant women and 3 from the nurse midwives. Data underscore the need to dialogue with all pregnant women about CAM use, and to mainstream CAM in education programs. Given the paucity of evidence for safety and efficacy during pregnancy for most CAM therapies, decision-making strategies to fill those knowledge gaps are urgently needed. Key words: Complementary therapies, alternative medicine, pharmacognosy, traditional medicine, decision-making, pregnancy, obstetrical providers
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom