z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Is Country branding a panacea or poison?
Author(s) -
V Mugobo Virimai,
I Ukpere Wilfred
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
african journal of business management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1993-8233
DOI - 10.5897/ajbm11.951
Subject(s) - panacea (medicine) , globalization , poverty , famine , development economics , big business , developing country , business , political science , economy , economic growth , economics , market economy , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology , law
The momentum towards complete globalisation advocated by proponents of the benefits of one big business village as the answer to the suffering of third world countries, has now been slowed down by the uncertainty resultant from the hitherto unprecedented global meltdown. With the coughing of America, the whole world seems to be catapulting into one big mess due to the global economic quagmire. Consequently, there is a global scramble for the limited and constantly contracting financial and market resources. Third world countries, rich in natural resources but insignificant global players, have been relegated to perpetual recipients of aid, finished products and obsolete or second rate technology. Despite having 53 countries, Africa is painted en bloc as a “dark continent” dogged by civil wars, disease, poverty and famine. This “bad continent” image thus affects all African countries including those that are fairly stable such as South Africa, Botswana, and Egypt. This scenario necessitates country differentiation through individualised or regionalised country branding.   Key words: Brand, competitiveness, globalisation, nation branding.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom