English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the analysis of variance, the comparison of means is essential when the calculated F is significant at 0.05 or 0.01 probability level and there are more than two treatments, because the significant F only rejects the null hypothesis, according to which the treatments or samples do not differ statistically. This study was aimed at to evaluate the similarities and differences between the classifications of means of Tukey, SNK, Scott-Knott and Duncan tests, as well as to demonstrate the performance of the software Assistat in the analysis of experimental data of the agricultural research. Data of agricultural experiments were analyzed using the models of the analysis of variance (ANOVA), as completely randomized and randomized block experiments. It was concluded that the Tukey test provides moredetailed results in comparison to the tests of Duncan, Scott-Knott and SNK, but not very different, and it is the most used test. The tests of Duncan, Scott-Knott and SNK tend to show similar results, except for the fact that, in the Scott-Knott test, no mean can belong to more than one group. The tests of Duncan and SNK, for being similar, except for the utilized distribution, almost always show the same results.

Comparison of means of agricultural experimentation data through different tests using the software Assistat