English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This study applies content analysis to compare assessments of 153 titles in American history, each reviewed in Choice , American Historical Review (AHR) , and Journal of American History (JAH) between 1988 and 1995. A numerical rating system is used to quantify reviewers’ overall opinions and their use of specific evaluative criteria. Study findings include: most books were praised in all three journals; the mean overall rating was highest in Choice and lowest in JAH ; little agreement existed in identifying either outstanding titles or inferior titles; reviews in Choice contained the fewest evaluative criteria, but appeared 8.5 to 10.6 months prior to reviews of the same titles in JAH and AHR .

college and research libraries/college and research libraries

Evaluating Review Content for Book Selection: An Analysis of American History Reviews in &lt;i&gt;Choice&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;American Historical Review&lt;/i&gt;, and &lt;i&gt;Journal of American History&lt;/i&gt;