Screening for Postpartum Depression in American Indian/Alaska Native Women: A Comparison of Two Instruments
Author(s) -
Jennifer L. Heck
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
american indian and alaska native mental health research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.44
H-Index - 24
ISSN - 0893-5394
DOI - 10.5820/aian.2502.2018.74
Subject(s) - edinburgh postnatal depression scale , patient health questionnaire , postpartum depression , clinical psychology , medicine , depression (economics) , scale (ratio) , predictive validity , psychometrics , internal consistency , psychiatry , psychology , pregnancy , depressive symptoms , cartography , anxiety , macroeconomics , biology , economics , genetics , geography
This review examined validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to identify an appropriate postpartum depression (PPD) screening tool for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women in the U.S. Databases were searched using: EPDS paired with psychometric properties or validation and PHQ-9 paired with PPD and psychometric properties or validation, yielding a final sample of 58 articles. Both tools have good internal consistency, but discriminative validity for detecting PPD in women from non-Western cultures is low. Positive predictive values in these women are low and diverse (EPDS [n = 21] median 67%, range 21.1-90%; PHQ-9 [n = 1] median 26%). The low predictive accuracy of both tools suggests the tools may be culturally biased.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom