English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Ultrasound images suffer of multiplicative noise named speckle. Bayesian shrinkage in transform domain is a well-known method based on finding threshold value to suppress the speckle noise. The main problem of applying Bayesian shrinkage is finding the optimum threshold value in appropriate transform domain. In this paper, we compare the performance of adaptive Bayesian thresholding when nonsubsampled Wavelet, Contourlet and Shearlet transforms are used. We processed two synthetic test images and three original ultrasound images as well to demonstrate the efficiency of the designed filters. In order to compare the performance of Bayesian shrinkage when employing the three mentioned transform domain, we used peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), mean square error (MSE), and structural similarity (SSIM) as the full-reference (FR) objective criteria parameters and noise variance (NV), mean square difference (MSD), and equivalent number of looks (ENL) as the no-reference (NR) objective criteria parameters

Comparing Nonsubsampled Wavelet, Contourlet and Shearlet Transforms for Ultrasound Image Despeckling