Clinical Outcomes and Electrolyte Balance Factors in Complex Cardiac Operations in Adults; Del Nido® Versus Custodiol® Cardioplegia Solutions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Author(s) -
Mohammad Javad Mehrabanian,
Mehdi Dehghani Firoozabadi,
Seyed Hossein Ahmadi Tafti,
Seyed Khalil Forouzan Nia,
Atabak Najafi,
Meysam Mortazian,
Sam Zeraatian Nejad Davani,
Hassan Soltaninia,
Abbas Ghiasi,
Farhad Gorjipour,
Armita Mahdavi Gorabi
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
iranian red crescent medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2074-1812
pISSN - 2074-1804
DOI - 10.5812/ircmj.64648
Subject(s) - medicine , kowsar , randomized controlled trial , balance (ability) , electrolyte imbalance , clinical trial , electrolyte , anesthesia , cardiology , intensive care medicine , emergency medicine , physical therapy , chemistry , electrode
Background: Cardioplegia is used for protection of myocardium during cardiac operations. Del Nido® (DN) and Custodiol® cardioplegia (CC) solutions are used for prolonged protection of the myocardium during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Custodiol® cardioplegia solution is gaining popularity for myocardial protection during cardiopulmonary bypass. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of Custodiol® with another cardioplegia solution, Del Nido®, on myocardial protection during cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: In a randomized controlled clinical trial, forty patients were randomly allocated to Del Nido® and Custodiol® (CC) groups. Patients in both groups received a standard anesthesia protocol. For cardioplegia, in the DN group, the Del Nido® solution was administered every 90 minutes by the antegrade route. In the CC, group, the Custodiol® solution was administered in the same way at the beginning of the cardioplegia. Demographic information, blood chemistry parameters and other related perioperative and postoperative clinical indices were recorded. Results: Frequency of female patients was 14/21 (66.66%) in the DN and 12/19 (63.15%) in the CC group (P = 0.816), age was 57.14 ± 12.48 years versus 59.47 ± 11.96 years (P = 0.551), weight was 70.95 ± 9.56 kilograms versus 69.63 ± 7.64 kilograms (P = 0.635), CPB time was 103.19 ± 23.43 minutes versus 97.36 ± 16.7 minutes (P = 0.376), and cross-clamp time was 73.76 ± 19.66 minutes versus 83.95 ± 16.14 minutes (P = 0.083). Blood chemistry and blood gas analysis revealed a similar trend between the two groups in these parameters (P > 0.05) except for higher sodium levels after cardioplegia (P = 0.016) and end of CPB (P = 0.002), potassium levels after cardioplegia (P = 0.029), and bicarbonate anions at the end of bypass (P = 0.03) in the Custodiol® group. Conclusions: In conclusion, CC and DN offer effective myocardial protection during cardiopulmonary bypass. It is recommended to restrict the use of CC in patients susceptible to electrolyte disturbances.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom