Comparison of the Success Rate of Intubation Between the LMA Fastrach and AirQ-ILA Methods in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery During General Anaesthesia | Zendy

Seyed Alireza Seyed Siamdoust | Zendy; Faranak Rokhtabnak | Zendy; Soudabeh Djalali Motlagh | Zendy; Poupak Rahimzadeh | Zendy; Valiollah Hassani | Zendy; Mahdi Farnaghizad | Zendy

Open Access

Comparison of the Success Rate of Intubation Between the LMA Fastrach and AirQ-ILA Methods in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery During General Anaesthesia

Author(s) -

Seyed Alireza Seyed Siamdoust,

Faranak Rokhtabnak,

Soudabeh Djalali Motlagh,

Poupak Rahimzadeh,

Valiollah Hassani,

Mahdi Farnaghizad

Publication year - 2018

Publication title -

anesthesiology and pain medicine

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.438

H-Index - 26

eISSN - 2228-7531

pISSN - 2228-7523

DOI - 10.5812/aapm.63424

Subject(s) - medicine , intubation , anesthesia , insertion time , airway management , elective surgery , airway , blood pressure , tracheal tube , tracheal intubation , surgery , heart rate , significant difference

The LMAfastrach and AirQ-ILA methods were not significantly different regarding the success of airway instrument application and intubation, while the device insertion time and intubation time were significantly longer in the AirQ-ILA group in comparison with the LMAfastrach group.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research