Effects of Head Extension on Peak Airway Pressure During Mask-Ventilation: A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Single-Centre Trial
Author(s) -
Anna Fiala,
Ruth Kroess,
Sabrieururer,
Patrick Braun,
Nicole Nachbar,
Volker Wenzel,
Peter Paal
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
annals of anesthesiology and critical care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2588-283X
DOI - 10.5812/aacc.11435
Subject(s) - medicine , randomized controlled trial , head (geology) , airway , anesthesia , ventilation (architecture) , head and neck , surgery , engineering , mechanical engineering , geomorphology , geology
Background: Rescuers with basic skills may have difficulties to perform efficient and safe mask ventilation. This study aimed at determining the best head position for ventilation, while avoiding stomach inflation. Methods: Forty healthy patients were mechanically ventilated with a face mask (7 mL.kg). The head was positioned either with n = 20 or without a cushion support (n = 20), and in three different head extension positions. Results: Head angles differed more with no cushion support at 12°; 95% CI 6 18°), 25° (95% CI 17 33°) and 32° (95% CI 27 37°); P < 0.05) when compared with cushion support at 5° (95% CI 3 7°), 16° (95% CI 13 20°), and 22° (95% CI 18 26°); P < 0.05. Without cushion support, peak airway pressure in neutral position was higher (20 cmH2O, 95% CI 17 to 23 cmH2O) than in the anesthesiologist’s favorite position (16 cmH2O, 95% CI 13 to 19 cmH2O; P = 0.000) or in extension (16 ± 7 cmH2O, 95% CI 13 to 19 cmH2O; P = 0.000). Stomach inflation correlated with body mass index in the neutral position, and in the anesthesiologist’s preferred position without
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom