z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Development in Adversity: South Africa’s Defence Industrial Participation in Perspective
Author(s) -
Johan J Van Dyk,
Richard Haines,
Geoffrey Wood
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
scientia militaria south african journal of military studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2309-9682
pISSN - 2224-0020
DOI - 10.5787/44-2-1179
Subject(s) - ambiguity , perspective (graphical) , defence industry , product (mathematics) , perception , international trade , value (mathematics) , political science , economics , development economics , business , psychology , economic policy , geometry , machine learning , philosophy , linguistics , mathematics , artificial intelligence , neuroscience , computer science
Defence industrial participation (DIP) is a form of countertrade and falls in the sub-category of (defence) offsets. The South African DIP programme played a developmental role in the country’s defence industrial base (DIB), arresting its steady decline since the 1980s. This article discusses the perceived non-achievement of the 1997 DIP objectives and the reality of its manifestations over a 12-year period (2000–2012). It is argued that the DIP tripled the gross national product and improved the economy through the retention of some 58 000 jobs. However, the 2014 Defence Review paves the way for a new defence industrial dispensation. Notwithstanding, there is a need to explore the concomitant ambiguity that exists between perceptions of countertrade and offsets as trade-distorting practices and as value-adding prospects, and to ascertain how this reciprocal trade mechanism could be used better to promote the developmental aims and objectives of governments.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom