Evaluating the results of the Momguard noninvasive prenatal test
Author(s) -
Hae-Jin Hu,
Young-Jun Kwon,
MiJin Oh,
Jihun Kim,
Dae-Yeon Cho,
Dong-Hee Seo
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of genetic medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2233-9108
pISSN - 1226-1769
DOI - 10.5734/jgm.2015.12.2.96
Subject(s) - prenatal diagnosis , test (biology) , prenatal screening , medicine , obstetrics , pregnancy , genetics , biology , fetus , paleontology
from an NT ultrasound and maternal serum tests has been used for noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) [4]. If a test result indicates a sample is ‘screen positive’, chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis is performed to confirm the result. However, current maternal serum screening tests have a relatively low detection rate (50-95%) and high false-positive rate (5%) [5]. CVS and amniocentesis carry the risk of fetal loss, since they are invasive procedures and may present additional emotional burdens for the mother. The discovery of the existence of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal plasma in 1997 by Lo et al. [6] led to a new era for NIPT. Within the last two decades, advanced technologies such as digital polymerase chain reaction or massively parallel Evaluating the results of the Momguard noninvasive prenatal test
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom